Legal Opinion
United States v. Howell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 13, 2009No. 08-2126, 08-2171PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Circuit Judge.
This consolidated appeal involves two convictions under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901-16991, and its corresponding criminal offense statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2250. In separate proceedings, David Matthew Howell (Howell) and Charles Edward Thomas (Thomas) each conditionally pled guilty to one count of failure to register as a sex offender after traveling in interstate commerce in violation of § 2250.
In the district court, Howell and Thomas argued § 2250 and the registration requirement of SORNA, 42 U.S.C. § 16913, are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AmbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Paul ShenandoahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.