Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Shenandoah

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 9, 2010No. 09-1205PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Paul Shenandoah was indicted in December of 2007 for failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SOR- NA), 18 U.S.C. § 2250(1) and (2) and 42 U.S.C. § 14072(i)(1). He was also charged with two counts of knowingly and willfully providing false information to law enforcement officials regarding his federal sex offender registration offenses, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1512(b)(3).

He pleaded not guilty and asked the District Court to dismiss the indictment, arguing that SORNA…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. The United States v. Shirl F. Kapp, Ronald Klinger, Robert Lewis, Robert Miller and Paul Briggs. Appeal of Paul BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API