Legal Opinion

Yellow Medicine County Bank v. Cook

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1895No. Nos. 9371—(114)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Yellow Medicine county, Powers, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, J.2

June 4, 1892, defendants, brothers, carrying on quite a large farm together, executed and delivered their promissory note to plaintiff, an incorporated state bank, due in 6 months, for $3,500, with interest payable in advance. To secure its payment, and at the same time, defendants executed and delivered a second mortgage upon real estate, their farm, and a chattel mortgage on all of their personal property, including growing crops. This action was brought to recover possession, or value, in case a delivery could not be had, of a portion of the mortgaged personal property, and the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kommer v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Saxe v. WomackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Temple v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Brown v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API