Legal Opinion

Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1928No. 21098 and 21184PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.

These two proceedings in error were heard together in this court, and will be disposed of in one opinion.

The plaintiff in error in case No. 21184, J. P. Grubb, doing business as the Tri-State Transit Company, filed an application with the Public Utilities Commission for a certificate to operate an interstate motorbus line between the city of Columbus, Ohio, and the city of Huntington, W. Va., and return. The route designated in the application passed through the border cities of Portsmouth and Ironton, Ohio, crossed the Ohio river at Ironton to Russell, Ky., and thence through the states of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kanawha Valley Transportation Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Waer Bus Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. KANAWHA VAL. TRANSP. CO. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Rosen v. LutzDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1934
  5. Application of DoherNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API