Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Lutz

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 6, 1934No. 470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALTZELL, District Judge.

On the 1st day of August, 1933, plaintiff filed in this eourt a bill in equity in which an injunction is sought to prevent the defendants, Philip Lutz, as Attorney General of Indiana; Paul Pry, as excise director of Indiana, and the other defendants, as state and county law enforcement officers, from interfering with him in the conduct of a business of selling at wholesale aleoholie malt beverages.

There was enacted by the General Assembly of' the state of Indiana, at its 1933 session, a law providing for the sale, etc., of alcoholic beverages, etc., under certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Blythe v. HinckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1954
  2. In re Fred W. Mears Heel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947
  3. In re United Last Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API