Legal Opinion

Testerman v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1985No. 382, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALPERT, Judge.

In this appeal we are called upon to decide, among other things, what evidence Maryland’s Rape Shield statute 1 excludes. The statute provides, in relevant part:(a) Evidence relating to victim’s chastity. — Evidence relating to a victim’s reputation for chastity and opinion evidence relating to a victim’s chastity are not admissible in any prosecution for commission of a rape or sexual offense in the first or second degree. Evidence of specific instances of the victim’s prior sexual conduct may be admitted only if the judge finds the evidence is relevant and is material to a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Abraham KastoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kennedy v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. State v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. McLean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eiler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. State v. GonyawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. People v. GarciaColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Shand v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API