Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Williams v. Saif Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1990No. WCB 87-00078; CA A50956; SC S36867Published

1Opinion of the Court

797 P.2d 1036 (1990)

310 Or. 320

In the matter of the Compensation of Mary E. WILLIAMS, Claimant.

Mary E. Williams, Respondent On Review,

v.

SAIF Corporation and Hill Investments, Dba Sheridan Care Center, Petitioners On Review.

WCB 87-00078; CA A50956; SC S36867.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 12, 1990.

Decided September 20, 1990.

Jerome Lidz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners on review. With him on the petition were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Darris K. Rowell, Salem, argued the cause and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API