Legal Opinion
Hawkins v. Lucier
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 30, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated April 2, 1998, as granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to compel them to disclose video surveillance tapes pursuant to CPLR 3101 (i), and denied their cross motion to compel the injured plaintiff to appear for a further examination before trial and for a protective order regarding the videotapes.
Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, so much of the notice of appeal as purports to appeal from that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Kane v. Her-Pet Refrigeration, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Simon v. Massapequa General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Simon v. Krueger International, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Falk v. InzinnaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Zegarelli v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003