Falk v. Inzinna
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Cozier, J.
On this appeal, we consider whether a defendant in a personal injury action is entitled to insist upon a plaintiffs deposition prior to disclosure to the plaintiff of surveillance videotapes, in light of the 1993 enactment of CPLR 3101 (i). There is a conflict between the approaches adopted in the other Appellate Divisions based upon the recent ruling by the Appellate Division, First Department (see Tai Tran v New Rochelle Hosp. Med. Ctr., 291 AD2d 121). However, the issue is one of first impression for this Court. For the reasons stated herein, this Court finds,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Barouh Eaton Allen Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- DiNardo v. KoronowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Edwards-Pitt v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rotundi v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tai Tran v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Samide v. Roman Catholic DioceseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Nimkoff v. Central Park Plaza Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Fox v. Grand Slam Banquet HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Sun Plaza Enterprises Corp. v. Crown TheatresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.