Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zegarelli v. Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2003Published

1DissentKehoe, J.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, there is no support in the record for Supreme Court’s conclusion that there was a failure by defendant either to disclose the videotape evidence or to authenticate the videotape properly for admission in evidence. I thus conclude that the court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion to preclude defendant from presenting the videotape in evidence.

Defendant’s investigator made a surveillance videotape of John N. Zegarelli (plaintiff) “quickly and vigorously” shoveling snow between the time of his motor vehicle accident and trial. The videotape was made using an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Barrowman v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Tai Tran v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Claim of De Marco v. Millbrook Equestrian CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Hicklen v. Broadway West Street AssociatesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API