Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Watson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1935No. Appeal 98PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

The defendant in this case was indicted for riot; also for simple assault and battery. He was tried and convicted of the latter only, the riot charge having been dropped.

Defendant was one of a group of pickets who, on the morning of March 3, 1934, was walking in front of Bornot’s Cleaning plant at 34th Street and Lehigh Avenue, Philadelphia, Pa. The prosecuting witness, Harris, testified that he was hit once, from behind, on the left side of the face, while loading a truck of Bornot’s which was backed against the curb, and that he did not see who hit him. The defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StabinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Commonwealth v. NafusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. RonelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SyrenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth v. PresognaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. StoltzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API