De Mers v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Hen-mepin county, entered pursuant to an order at the trial, by Hicks, J. granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This action is for the recovery of the amount of -two promissory notes, executed by the defendant to the plaintiffs. ■The defence which we are to consider rests upon these facts: The notes were given for the purchase price of certain lots and a part of a block, in a tract of land which had been platted as an addition to .a town-site, in the county of Polk, by these plaintiffs and others, the proprietors of the land. The contract of purchase was evidenced by •> bond for a deed, executed to the defendant by such proprietors. At that time the plat of a part of these lands had not been signed ,by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Pangborn v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Bemis v. BeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
- Niemeyer v. WrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- Watrous v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Sanford v. Duluth & Dakota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Vermont Loan & Trust Co. v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Washburn Mill Co. v. BartlettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- In Re Estate of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.