Legal Opinion

Little Red School House, Ltd. v. City of Greensboro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1984No. 8418SC80PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

By Assignments of Error Nos. 2, 7, 11, and 23, petitioners contend that the trial court erred in determining that the City of Greensboro complied with N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 160A-47 in connection with the provision of water and sewer services to the annexed area. G.S. 160A-47 in pertinent part provides:

A municipality exercising authority under this Part shall make plans for the extension of services to the area proposed to be annexed and shall . . . prepare a report setting forth such plans to provide services to such area. The report shall include:(1) A map ... of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Lutterloh v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. In Re Annexation Ordinance No. 300-XSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Matter of City of Durham Annexation Ord. No. 5791Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Matthews v. Town of Blowing RockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Chapel Hill Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API