Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2003No. COA02-1518Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion.

I. Issue

The issue before this Court is whether the trial court erred in concluding the City’s annexation of Non-Urban Areas 1 and 4 met the requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-48(d)(2).

*16TT. N.C. fíen. St,at. g 160A-48(dY2)

“The primary rule of statutory construction is that the intent of the legislature controls the interpretation of a statute.” Stevenson v. City of Durham; 281 N.C. 300, 303, 188 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1972). “If the language used is clear and unambiguous, the Court does not engage in judicial construction but must apply the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Fowler v. ValencourtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Three Guys Real Estate v. Harnett CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Grassy Creek Neighborhood Alliance, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API