Legal Opinion
Petrie v. Petrie
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1972No. Docket 11980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.
The question here presented is of first impression. It is of measurable significance to the trial bench and the profession. It involves an apparent conflict between two statutes. The first purports to place payments made pursuant to an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Act beyond reach of any liability for debt. We set it forth.
"Sec. 821. (1) No payment under this act shall be assignable or subject to attachment or garnishment or be held liable in any way for any debts. In case of insolvency every liability for compensation under this act shall constitute a first lien upon all the property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Audubon v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cunningham v. CunninghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Hutchins v. HutchinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Evans v. EvansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cardenas v. CardenasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Allen v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.