Legal Opinion

Cardenas v. Cardenas

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 6, 1984No. 83-386-M.PPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Justice.

This case comes before us on petition of Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) and Teknor Apex Company (the employer of Peter Cardenas, hereinafter Teknor) for a stay of an order entered by a justice of the Family Court restraining Hartford and Teknor from disbursing any sums awarded to Peter Cardenas (husband) as a result of a commutation proceeding before the Workers’ Compensation Commission. The petition also requested a stay of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Commission requiring Hartford and Teknor to pay over such sums directly to the husband…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paolino v. PaolinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  2. Brierly v. BrierlySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  3. Meadows v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Hartt v. HarttSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  5. Calvin v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Lisa Diane G.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  2. Sattari v. SattariSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
  3. In Re BonzeyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
  4. Blais v. R.I. Airport Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  5. Krivitsky v. KrivitskySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API