Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2010No. Docket No. 285541PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtK. F. Kelly, J.

In this divorce action, we must decide whether, and to what extent, workers’ compensation benefits received during a marriage are to be considered marital property. We hold that such benefits are marital property only to the extent that they compensate for wages lost during the marriage. We further conclude that the trial court erroneously awarded *197defendant, as his separate property, that portion of his workers’ compensation award used as part of the down payment on the parties’ second marital home. We reverse and remand.

I. BASIC FACTS

The parties were married in October 1982. In November…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dart v. DartMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dart v. DartMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sweatt v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hodge v. ParksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Nathan v. Libra (In re Libra)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  3. Amy K Wolcott v. Edgar J WolcottMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Animesh Agarwal v. Seema AgarwalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Brandon Bernard Carr v. Caci Ann CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API