Legal Opinion

Litzelman v. Town of Fox

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. -Justice Murphy

delivered the opinion of the court.

April 7, 1935, pursuant to the provisions of the Dram Shop Act, there was submitted to the voters of Fox Township, Jasper county, the question whether the sale at retail of alcoholic liquor should be prohibited in said township. The affirmative of the proposition carried by a majority of eight votes.

Theodore Litzelman and four others, voters and taxpayers of said township, who are herein referred to as plaintiffs, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Jasper county, charging irregularities in the count of the ballots and prayed for a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. McWeeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Saylor v. DuelIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Bennett v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Spies v. ByersIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Payne v. EmmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kraft v. SolonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Cundiff v. JeterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  3. D. Gottlieb & Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  4. Boyd v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. 110 Larkin, LLC. v. WeberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API