Wells v. Sears
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.
On defendant’s exceptions to acceptance of Referee’s report. The action is one brought by a guest passenger against the operator of the automobile in which he was riding. The Referee found for the plaintiff and assessed damages in the sum of $750 with costs. The legal issues raised by the exceptions are made clear by a recital, as far as germane, of findings of the Referee.
“Just prior to the collision an automobile driven by one, Guy E. Annis, approached the highway from a private driveway on defendant’s right. Mr. Annis was a contractor having" men at work in the near vicinity of the highway…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- McAndrews v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Oppenheim v. BarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Gallup v. LazottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Scammon v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Piche v. NugentDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000