Legal Opinion

Wells v. Sears

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 4, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

On defendant’s exceptions to acceptance of Referee’s report. The action is one brought by a guest passenger against the operator of the automobile in which he was riding. The Referee found for the plaintiff and assessed damages in the sum of $750 with costs. The legal issues raised by the exceptions are made clear by a recital, as far as germane, of findings of the Referee.

“Just prior to the collision an automobile driven by one, Guy E. Annis, approached the highway from a private driveway on defendant’s right. Mr. Annis was a contractor having" men at work in the near vicinity of the highway…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. McAndrews v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  3. Oppenheim v. BarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Gallup v. LazottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Scammon v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  3. Piche v. NugentDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
  4. Walter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API