Legal Opinion
Piche v. Nugent
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 5, 2006No. 2:05-cr-00082PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED 1 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION 2 ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY
KRAVCHUK, United States Magistrate Judge.
With the pending motions Daniel Piché seeks to preclude the defendants from using the “helmet defense” to obtain a comparative negligence instruction or from introducing comparative negligence expert testimony at trial that seeks to assign causative fault to Piché and his deceased wife, Lyne Laprise, for not wearing helmets while riding on Piché’s motorcycle. It is undisputed that the accident in question arose solely as a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. MooneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Merchants Insurance Co. of New Hampshire, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Maine Human Rights Commission v. Sunbury Primary Care, P.A.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
- McKinley v. CassonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010