Legal Opinion

Clements v. ITT Hartford

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 25, 1998No. 91,299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReif, J.

¶ 1 This appeal arises from a suit by the personal representative of the estate of Her-chel Dean Clements to recover damages for alleged bad faith by Mr. Clements’ automobile insurer, ITT Hartford. Personal representative contended that ITT Hartford acted in bad faith in delaying payment of uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits to Mr. Clements during his lifetime. There is no dispute that Mr. Clements retained a lawyer who made demand for ITT Hartford to pay damages for ITT Hartford’s alleged bad faith in delaying payment. However, there is also no dispute that Mr. Clements died before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Harrison v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. LemmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Carne v. Maryland Casualty CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API