Carne v. Maryland Casualty Company
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buenett
This suit in its final analysis is brought to recover excess over the policy limits of an automobile liability insurance policy. The trial judge sustained the plea in abatement on the ground that the cause of action did not survive. The plaintiff below has appealed, and counsel presented a learned and extended argument in which, conceding, as we understand it, that the recovery sought is in excess of the provision in the policy covering property damages.
The defendant in error issued to the plaintiff’s intestate an automobile liability policy which protected the intestate for damages growing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Fire & Casualty Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co. v. HammondTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- Spence v. CarneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
- Daniel v. Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Billingsley v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Oliver Davis and Lillie Mae DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Central, Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Dillingham v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Rutter v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.