Legal Opinion

Starr v. Dow Agrosciences LLC

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 11, 2004No. Civ. 03-830-MOPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Don and Karen Starr are residents of Summerville, Oregon where they make their living as mint farmers. Against three nonresident companies, the plaintiffs assert several common law theories, alleging that the application of a herbicide manufactured by defendants caused reductions in their mint-crop yield for 2001. Defendants respond that plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by federal law, specifically, the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”) and its implementing regulations. Defendants further argue that, even if the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Transamerica Insurance v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Steele v. Mt. Hood Meadows Oregon, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Widing v. Schwabe, Williamson & WyattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaste v. Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  3. Towne v. RobbinsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
  4. Carpentier v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  5. J. Lilly, LLC v. Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API