Legal Opinion

State v. Wallace

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1967Published

1Per curiam

Defendant’s plea, “guilty of receiving stolen property knowing it to have been stolen,” is insufficient to support the judgment.

“In the bill of indictment the defendant was charged with a felony, that is, receiving goods of the value of more than one hundred dollars. G.S. 14-71 and G.S. 14-72. In order for the defendant to be found guilty under G.S. 14-71, it is incumbent upon the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of the goods was more than one hundred dollars. This is an essential element of the crime because G.S. 14-72 specifically provides that 'the receiving of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TessnearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. . TruesdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. S. J. Bartholomew & Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. ArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API