Legal Opinion

S. J. Bartholomew & Co. v. Parrish

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The judge found the facts and embodied them in the judgment. On the findings made, supported, as they are, by competent evidence, the motion was properly overruled. Smith v. Holmes, 148 N. C., 210; Marsh v. Griffin, 123 N. C., 660. But in the statement of case on appeal the following appears:

“At the conclusion of the reading of the affidavits the court stated that, while -it seemed a great hardship upon the defendant, it would hold as a matter of law upon the defendant’s own showing and taking tbe contents of tbe affidavits in consideration, tbat be was not entitled to bave tbe judgment set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. State v. Matthews.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Marsh v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Smith v. Holmes Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Central Life Insurance v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API