Legal Opinion
Lamar Advertising v. State Dot.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 15, 1996No. 1941386, 1941387 and 1941396Published
1Opinion of the Court
694 So.2d 1256 (1996)
LAMAR ADVERTISING OF MONTGOMERY, INC., and Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
v.
STATE of Alabama DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
HEADRICK OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC.
v.
STATE of Alabama DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
1941386, 1941387 and 1941396.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
March 15, 1996.
Rehearing Denied April 18, 1997.
W. Joseph McCorkle, Jr., and Dorman Walker of Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, for appellants Lamar Advertising of Montgomery, Inc., and Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
Susan Russ Walker of Miller, Hamilton, Snider & Odom, Montgomery, for appellant Headrick Outdoor Advertising,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. Houston County Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- State Hwy. Dept. v. HEADRICK OUTDOOR ADV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Department of Industrial Relations v. Little Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Hawley Fuel Corp. v. Burgess Mining & Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.