Legal Opinion

Wofford v. Farmer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals, Fifth District, in an appeal from Henderson County. The suit was "brought by Farmer against Wofford et al., and plaintiff had judgment, which, upon defendant’s appeal, was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. Appellants thereupon obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

The defendant in error brought this suit against the plaintiffs in error to recover damages for the seizure of certain cattle levied upon by virtue of two writs of attachment against one Bfarroll.' The defendants in the trial court, the plaintiffs here, were the sheriff and the sureties on his official bond and the attaching creditors. They pleaded “that the cattle seized and levied upon were in fact the property of Harrell, the defendant in the writ of attachment, and that if the same had been transferred by Harrell to Farmer the transfer was made for the purpose and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bounds v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Robertson v. MelaskyTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Connell v. NickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Donaldson v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Omar Gasoline Co. v. MulliganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Omar Gasoline Co. v. MulliganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API