Legal Opinion

Lind v. Closs

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1891No. 13379PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of - Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

When this cause was in Department One the following opinion was prepared by Commissioner Belcher. It is hereby adopted by the court in Bank, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment and order of the superior court are reversed, and the cause remanded.

“The facts stated in the complaint are these: The plaintiffs were husband and wife, and on or about the twenty-sixth day of October, 1887, at their residence in the town of Auburn, Placer County, ‘the defendant wickedly, maliciously, and violently assaulted said Johanna Lind, one of the plaintiffs herein, by jumping upon her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. ArdagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Murray v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Reynolds v. Natural Gas Equipment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Delia S. v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Evje v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API