Legal Opinion
Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 1, 1993No. 91-3826PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
This case takes place at the intersection of labor relations and insurance law. For almost three years, Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. (Baylor) and the Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local No. 20 (the Union) were parties to a collective bargaining agreement. The agreement obligated Baylor to make certain payments to an employee pension fund. In January 1987, Baylor informed the Union that it did not intend to renew the agreement when it expired, according to its terms, on April 30, 1987. Believing that it was free of all obligations under the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Roess v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bernstein v. BankertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Pacific Insurance Company, Limited, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Eaton Vance Management, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Warren K. Huntzinger and Nancy J. Huntzinger v. Hastings Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Irving H. Rozenfeld v. Medical Protective Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- August Entertainment, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.