United States v. Citizens and Southern National Bank
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
MOYE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
A. The Proceeding and the Parties
This action, instituted by the United States of America (“the Government”) under Section 15 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. § 25], seeks injunctive relief to prevent and restrain alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. § 18], which would result from the consummation of contemplated mergers within the Atlanta Metropolitan Area which are described below. The Government also alleges violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C. § 1] and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Independent Bankers Ass'n v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Weit v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Gates v. CollierDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1976
- Jackson v. RiddellDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.