Legal Opinion

United States v. Citizens and Southern National Bank

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided June 3, 1974No. Civ. A. 15823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

MOYE, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

A. The Proceeding and the Parties

This action, instituted by the United States of America (“the Government”) under Section 15 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. § 25], seeks injunctive relief to prevent and restrain alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. § 18], which would result from the consummation of contemplated mergers within the Atlanta Metropolitan Area which are described below. The Government also alleges violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C. § 1] and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Independent Bankers Ass'n v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. Weit v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  4. Gates v. CollierDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1976
  5. Jackson v. RiddellDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API