Legal Opinion

Solo v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. Calendar No. 41,887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, C. J.

The plaintiffs in the three consolidated eases herein filed petitions for mandamus in the court below to compel defendants, city of Detroit and board of street railway commissioners, to grant them seniority rights in accordance with their respective claims as employees of said respondents. Daniel Solo claims he is entitled to have seniority computed from August 12, 1913; Myron McConnell claims from October 15, 1917; and Arthur Endres seeks a rating commencing December 26, 1919. Defendants claim that the seniority rights of all three plaintiffs should be computed from August 21, 1928.

Prior to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sezor v. Proctor & Gamble Soap Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. RicherMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Wolverine Golf Club v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Janigian v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. S., C. M.W. of A. v. DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Dearborn Fire Fighters Ass'n v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API