Legal Opinion
Russell v. Home Insurance
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 12, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFarrington, J.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment below and defendant appeals bringing but, one question for decision here, and that purely one of law. We will mainly adopt appellant’s statement for this opinion.
“This is an action on a fire insurance policy, issued by appellant to respondent, to which was attached what is known as a short-form mortgage or loss payable clause, making loss, if any thereunder, payable to the Bank of Hartville, as its interest might appear, but subject to all terms and conditions of the policy. It covered $1500 on a farm dwelling, located on a tract of 427 acres, and $500 on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Springfield Steam Laundry Co. v. Traders' InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Brecht v. Law, Union & Crown Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Fort Scott Building & Loan Ass'n v. Palatine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Snyder v. MurdockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prudential Insurance v. German Mutual Life Insurance Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Patten v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Wilmurth v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
- Patten v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930