Legal Opinion

Super Sulky, Inc. v. United States Trotting Association

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1999No. 97-4291PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States Trotting Association (“USTA”) is a non-profit Ohio corporation that establishes rules for harness racing, registers horses, and licenses owners and drivers. In 1993, the USTA adopted rules to standardize the design of the “sulky,” a lightweight two-wheeled buggy that the horse pulls in harness racing. By doing so, it induced various state racing commissions to ban a novel form of sulky known as the Cheetah, created by the Super Sulky Corporation. This drove Super Sulky out of business. In response, Super Sulky brought suit against the USTA and numerous…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kenty v. Transamerica Premium InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Miles Tefft v. James Seward, A/K/A Jessie SewardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. United States v. Clarence D. SchreaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Kent A. Sommer and Andrea Sommer v. G. William Davis and Charles G. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Heather Chandler, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Specialty Tires of America (Tennessee), Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Niemi v. NHK Spring Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API