Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Oregon Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided July 21, 1999No. TC 4293, 4292, 4312, 4313, and 4314PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

Plaintiffs (taxpayers) in these consolidated cases all protest and appeal from imposition of the Western Oregon Forestland and Privilege Tax (WOPT) on timber harvested from their lands. Taxpayers claim that the tax is not applicable to them and, if applicable, it violates various provisions of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment (Equal Protection Clause) to the United States Constitution. There is no dispute of material fact, and the matter is before the court on taxpayers’ motion for partial summary judgment and Defendant Department of Revenue’s (the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Standard Lbr. Co. v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Simon v. NorthupOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State Ex Rel. State Public Welfare Commission v. County Court of Malheur CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
  2. Douglas County v. SmithOregon Tax Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API