Legal Opinion
Ramstack v. Department of Army
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0658 (RMU)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in part the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss and for partial summary judgment, and the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. The pro se plaintiff, Thomas Ram-stack, brings suit against multiple defendants 1 under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Lardner v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Vest v. Department of the Air ForceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Scott v. ConleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Ramstack v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.