Legal Opinion
National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0443PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, National Security Counselors (“NSC”), brings three related actions against six federal intelligence and defense agencies, claiming numerous violations of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the FOIA, the APA, the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361, and the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. The gravamen of the plaintiffs claims is that…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- New York Times Co. v. United States Deparment of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Shapiro v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.