Van Denburgh v. Sweeney Land Co.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
DAVIS, Judge:
{1 David S. Van Denburgh, individually and in his capacity as the trustee of the David S$. Van Denburgh Revocable Living Trust, appeal the trial court's summary judgment ruling rejecting his claim to a prescriptive easement over a strip of land located on property jointly owned by Sweeney Land Company and Park City II, LLC (collectively, Sweeney). We affirm.
12 Summary judgment is appropriate when "the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Basic Research, LLC v. Admiral Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
- Harkness v. WoodmanseeUtah Supreme Court · 1891
- Marchant v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- S and W Hunting Ranch v. FautinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024