Wright v. Goleta Water District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE, P. J.
Here, we are asked to decide whether a trial court, in a judicial determination of a ground water dispute among private parties and public entities, may define or otherwise limit future ground water rights of an overlying owner who has not yet exercised those rights. We hold that it may not and reverse the judgment.
Facts
The Scenario
The instant case flows from an action for declaratory and injunctive relief filed in November 1973, by certain overlying landowners (Landowners) against the Goleta Water District (District) to determine relative rights to ground water use in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of Barstow v. Mojave Water AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- New York Times Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Pleasant Valley Canal Co. v. BorrorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.