Legal Opinion

Gillard v. AIG Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 2011No. 10 EAP 2010PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*69 OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

In this appeal, we consider whether, and to what degree, the attorney-client privilege attaches to attorney-to-client communications.

This litigation entails a claim of bad faith arising out of insurance companies’ handling of Appellee’s uninsured motorist claim. During discovery, Appellee sought production of all documents from the file of the law firm representing the insurers in the underlying litigation (who are the appellants here). Appellants withheld and redacted documents created by counsel, asserting the attorney-client privilege.

In response, Appellee sought to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. G. BouSamra, M.D. v. Excela Health, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Yocabet v. UPMC PresbyterianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API