Legal Opinion

State v. Chester

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1976No. 7625SC141PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

In State v. Teasley, 9 N.C. App. 477, 176 S.E. 2d 838, cert. denied, 277 N.C. 459, 177 S.E. 2d 900 (1970), this Court held that to convict for a violation of G.S. 20-28 (a) the State must prove: (1) the operation of a motor vehicle, (2) on a public highway, (3) while one’s operator’s license is suspended or revoked; and that when the Department complied with the procedure (G.S. 20-48) as to notice of suspension or revocation of operator’s license, such compliance constituted constructive notice to the defendant that his license had been suspended or revoked. Judge Mallard, for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. TeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. LeshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API