Legal Opinion

State v. Woody

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1991No. 9024SC419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence seized from stopping his vehicle, which he contends was unlawful; the admission into evidence of the order revoking his driver’s license; and the denial of his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s evidence. None of the defendant’s assignments has merit and we find no error in the trial.

Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence was properly overruled for two reasons: First, no evidence pertinent to his conviction was obtained from the stop; second, the stop was not unlawful because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. TrapperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. ChesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Combs v. EllerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HargraveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. ColtraneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. ColtraneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. ColtraneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API