State Ex Rel. Office of the Public Counsel & Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers v. Missouri Public Service Commission
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge.
Appellants, Office of Public Counsel 1 (“OPC”) and Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers 2 (“MIEC”) appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County affirming the Public Service Commission (“PSC”) Order promulgating 4 CSR 240-3.162 and 4 CSR 240-20.091 (the “Regulations”) as lawful and reasonable. OPC and MIEC raise four points of error on appeal. They argue: (1) the PSC failed to timely adopt the Regulations pursuant to section 386.266.9; 3 (2) the Regulations allow electric utilities to earn more than a fair rate of return on equity for each…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Utility Consumers Council of Missouri, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Union Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- AG Processing Inc. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- In the Matter of Kansas City Power&Light Company's Request for Authority to Implement a General Rate Increase for Electric Service, And Midwest energy Consumers' Group v. Missouri Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State ex rel. Public Counsel v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Noranda Aluminium, Inc. v. Public Service Com'n of StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.