Legal Opinion
Brown v. Coleman Investments, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided January 23, 1998No. Civ.A. 96-3297-B-M2PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON COLEMAN -INVESTMENT, INC.’S AND ROBERT COLEMAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
Coleman Investments, Inc. (“Coleman Toyota”) and Robert Coleman (“Coleman”) have filed a motion for summary judgment and for judgment on the pleadings. Because the Court has considered and relied on evidence outside of the pleadings,, the Court will treat the motion as a motion for summary judgment. For reasons which follow, the motion for summary judgment filed by Coleman Toyota and Coleman is GRANTED.
FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Lillie D. Brown (“Brown”)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baldwin v. Laurel Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998
- Brown v. Coleman Investments, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1998
- Turner v. II Diamond Motors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1998