Jonathan Lutz v. Pittsburgh Regional Transit
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JONATHAN LUTZ, 2:25-CV-00725-CCW Plaintiff, v PITTSBURGH REGIONAL TRANSIT, Defendant. OPINION Before the Court is Defendant Pittsburgh Regional Transit’s (“PRT”) Motion to Dismiss Count III of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”). ECF No. 22. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Motion. I. Background This lawsuit arises of out Plaintiff Jonathan Lutz’s work as a mechanic in PRT’s maintenance department from June 2018 until April 2022. ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 10, 50. Mr. Lutz alleges that PRT…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.