Legal Opinion

Meklir v. Bigham

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1985No. Docket 80928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3).

Plaintiff Rozanne Meklir was injured when the vehicle she was riding in was struck in the rear by defendant’s automobile. The trial court held as a matter of law that plaintiff Rozanne Meklir, although injured in the accident, had not sustained a serious impairment of body function and was barred from bringing an action in tort to recover for noneconomic damages under the no-fault act, MCL 500.3135; MSA 24.13135. Rozanne’s husband alleged loss of consortium. As his claim…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Feldman v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. McKendrick v. PetrucciMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Brooks v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Netter v. BowmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Netter v. BowmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API