Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Pera

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1961No. Civ. 18879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J. pro tem. *

In this proceeding in eminent domain the defendant landowners have appealed from a judgment awarding them $12,852 for the 3.048 acres taken and $934.50 for severance damages for the 8.742 acres not taken. The land taken by the state is for exchange with a railway company for a portion of the latter’s right of way needed for highway purposes.

The only instruction given which defendant now claims erroneous is a definition of just compensation: “The term ‘just compensation’ means ‘just’ not only to the party whose property is taken for public use but also ‘just’ to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. City of Fresno v. CloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Kinzli v. City of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
  5. CONTRA COSTA WATER DIST. v. Vaquero Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API