People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Pera
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J. pro tem. *
In this proceeding in eminent domain the defendant landowners have appealed from a judgment awarding them $12,852 for the 3.048 acres taken and $934.50 for severance damages for the 8.742 acres not taken. The land taken by the state is for exchange with a railway company for a portion of the latter’s right of way needed for highway purposes.
The only instruction given which defendant now claims erroneous is a definition of just compensation: “The term ‘just compensation’ means ‘just’ not only to the party whose property is taken for public use but also ‘just’ to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- City of Fresno v. CloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Kinzli v. City of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
- CONTRA COSTA WATER DIST. v. Vaquero Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.