Legal Opinion

Mann v. J.E. Baker Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1990No. Civ. A. 3:CV-89-1749PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Joan L. Mann, instituted this action when she was discharged from her employment with defendant, J.E. Baker Co. (J.E. Baker). Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), defendants, J.E. Baker, Donald Hennel, J.E. Baker’s Vice-President, and Gary W. Kyson, Director of Sales for its Cement Division, have moved to dismiss Counts V, VI, VII, and VIII of the complaint. Counts I-IV allege unlawful sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 Pa.Stat.Ann. 951…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Hart v. LudwigMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Darlington v. General ElectricSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Paul v. Lankenau HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fregara v. Jet Aviation Business JetsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. Charleswell v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
  3. Redick v. Kraft, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Keck v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. MacK v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API