Legal Opinion

Inland Manufacturing Division, General Motors Corp. v. Lawson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1967No. 3213PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerns, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County allowing the defendant-appellee Emma L. Lawson to participate in the State Insurance Fund.

She was employed by Inland Manufacturing Division, General Motors Corporation, plaintiff, appellant herein, as a entting-table worker with a fixed situs of employment in Inland’s plant in Dayton, Ohio, and worked the second shift which began at 3 p. m. and ended at 11 p. m.

Mrs. Lawson, as well as other workers on the second shift, was given a lunch break which began at 6:45 p. m. and ended at 7:20 p. m.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Marlow v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Industrial Commission v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Industrial Commission v. HenryOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Kasari v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frishkorn v. FlowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Waycott v. Beneficial Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Blair v. DaughertyOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Williams v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API