Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bernad v. City of Lakewood

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2000No. 75684Published

1DissentJohn T. Patton, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion based on the majority’s holding that a complaint in replevin restores a person’s right to possess or own property lawfully confiscated from a person under a legal disability.

The facts show Lakewood Police lawfully confiscated twenty-nine guns from Bernad’s home based on Bernad’s admission that he was under a legal disability and was prohibited from possessing firearms.

R.C. 2933.41(C) sets forth a two-pronged test to determine if a person loses ownership or possession of confiscated property:

“A person loses any right that the person may have to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Village of Chagrin Falls v. LovemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. City of Dayton v. BoddieOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Brafford v. CalhounOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Hutter v. City of WickliffeLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API