Legal Opinion

Brafford v. Calhoun

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1943No. 858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

This is an action in replevin to recover possession of a pinball machine. In the petition the defendant is described as the Chief of Police of Hamilton, and it is alleged that while acting in that capacity he seized the pin-ball machine and had ever since detained it from the plaintiff. It is also alleged that the machine was licensed by the United States of America.

The defendant’s answer was limited to denial that he wrongfully detained the machine from the plaintiff.

The evidence was limited to a description of the machine for the purpose, apparently, of proving that it…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cavalier v. Board of Liquor Control, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1954
  2. Bernad v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Grove Press, Inc. v. CorriganCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API